Customary Law and Gender Inequality in Property Inheritance in Sagamu Local Government Area (LGA), Southwest Nigeria
Keywords:
Customary law, women's inheritance rights, legal pluralism, feminist legal theory, human rights, Southwest NigeriaAbstract
The degree to which customary law safeguards women's property and inheritance rights in Southwest Nigerian communities was investigated in this study. Even though the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and Section 42 of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) Constitution all guarantee equality and forbid discrimination, women are still subject to unfair inheritance practices under customary law. The study examined the structure of customary inheritance systems, the legal protections provided to women, and the obstacles preventing successful implementation in order to investigate the ongoing gap between formal legal protections and discriminatory customary practices. The study concentrated on a few villages in Southwest Nigeria where customary law is still significant. The study used a socio-legal doctrinal methodology that involved the investigation of constitutional provisions, statutory legislation, judicial judgments, and pertinent scholarly literature. It was informed by legal pluralism theory, feminist legal theory, and a human rights-based approach. The results showed that inheritance customs are still primarily patrilineal, with daughters and widows often denied or given restricted inheritance rights. Even while judicial precedents and constitutional provisions offer significant legal protection, cultural resistance, legal pluralism, insufficient institutional processes, low legal awareness, and socioeconomic impediments continue to hinder enforcement. According to the study's findings, women's inheritance rights are more strongly recognized by law than in reality. It suggested extending legal awareness programmes, bolstering enforcement institutions, encouraging women's economic empowerment, and harmonising customary inheritance laws with international human rights norms and the constitution. By illustrating how legal heterogeneity and patriarchal customary norms continue to jeopardise the effective protection of women's inheritance rights in Nigeria, the study advances socio-legal scholarship.
Downloads
References
Adebayo, T. O., & Fashola, K. A. (2023). Gendered access to land and economic vulnerability among women in Nigeria. African Journal of Development and Policy Studies, 15(2), 66–82.
Adeyemi, K. O., & Ogunleye, T. A. (2022). Women's access to land and inheritance rights under Yoruba customary law. Journal of African Legal Thought, 9(1), 77–93.
Aderinto, S. (2021). Customary law and constitutional conflicts in Nigeria: A gendered perspective. Nigerian Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 45–62.
Akinwale, A. (2022). Legal pluralism and inheritance practices in Southwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Sociology and Development, 14(3), 101–118.
Akinyemi, R. O. (2022). Patriarchy and inheritance practices in Yoruba customary law: Implications for gender equality. Journal of African Legal Anthropology, 10(1), 41–59.
Babatunde, S. A. (2022). Legal pluralism and women's rights in Nigeria: Bridging statutory and customary law. Nigerian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 19(3), 88–107.
Balogun, M. S. (2023). Patriarchy and property rights in Yoruba customary inheritance systems. International Journal of Gender and Law in Africa, 6(2), 33–50.
Bartlett, K. T. (1990). Feminist legal methods. Harvard Law Review, 103(4), 829–888.
Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., & Wright, S. (1991). Feminist approaches to international law. American Journal of International Law, 85(4), 613–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203274
Cook, R. J. (Ed.). (1993). Human rights of women: National and international perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Eze, C. N. (2021). Judicial activism and women's inheritance rights in Nigeria. Nigerian Constitutional Law Review, 12(1), 88–104.
Fineman, M. A. (2005). Feminist legal theory. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 13(1), 13–23. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/jgspl/vol13/iss1/2
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press.
Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286
Ojo, T. A., & Salami, R. K. (2022). Gender inequality and property inheritance in Nigeria: Bridging the gap between law and custom. Journal of African Development Studies, 11(4), 55–73.
Okafor, C. N., & Nwankwo, I. C. (2021). Widowhood and property rights under customary law in Southern Nigeria. International Journal of Gender and Society, 8(4), 120–138.
Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.
Oladeji, B. O. (2020). Patrilineal inheritance and women's exclusion in Yoruba customary law. Journal of Social and Legal Anthropology, 7(2), 120–136.
Olawale, M. O., & Adeniran, J. T. (2023). Women's inheritance rights and customary practices in Yoruba communities. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 12(2), 73–91.
Santos, B. de Sousa. (1987). Law: A map of misreading. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 375–411.
UN Women. (2023). Gender equality in land and property rights in Sub-Saharan Africa. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. https://www.unwomen.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adegbemi Atanda Adewale

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share and adapt the material, provided proper credit is given.