An Analysis of Citizen Engagement and Participation in Local Government Processes

Authors

  • Abdulhakeem Adejumo
  • Zulfah Jumoke Abdulkareem

Keywords:

Citizen engagement, local government, participatory budgeting, community development, public consultation, information, and communication technology (ICT), capacity building.

Abstract

Citizen engagement in local government processes is vital for promoting participatory democracy and improving governance outcomes. This study investigates the mechanisms that enhance citizen engagement and participation in local government processes. The research utilizes a questionnaire administered among residents in selected Wards in Ilorin West Local Government Area of Kwara State, Nigeria, with a final sample size of 437 respondents. PLS-SEM was employed for data analysis. The findings reveal that community development, information, and communication technology (ICT), participatory budgeting, and public consultation have positive and significant relationships with citizen engagement in local government processes. However, the relationship between capacity building and citizen engagement is weak and non-significant. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence on the mechanisms that facilitate citizen engagement in local government administration. The findings have implications for theory and practice, highlighting the importance of community mobilization, ICT utilization, participatory budgeting, and public consultation in fostering citizen participation and improving local governance outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2017). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1), 13-19.

Dywili, S., & Draai, E. (2019). Citizen engagement to foster inclusive development planning in local governance. Administratio Publica, 27(3), 256-273.

Freeman, R. M., & Bartle, I. (2016). Citizen participation and changing governance: Cases of devolution in England. Public Administration, 94(4), 903-919.

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Politics & Society, 31(1), 73-103.

Ganuza, E., & Cabannes, Y. (2019). Citizen participation in local public policies: The role of intermediaries. In Civic engagement and politics (pp. 115-135). Routledge.

Ganuza, E., & Cabannes, Y. (2019). Popular participation and local democracy in Brazil: Assessing the impact of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality rates. World Development, 117, 160-171.

Gascó-Hernández, M., Torres-Toukoumidis, Á., & Pardo, C. (2020). Social media and local governments: Benefits, challenges, and best practices. Government Information Quarterly, 37(2), 101475.

Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards Participatory Governance: Assessing the Transformative Possibilities. In J. Gaventa &

Mærøe, A. R., Norta, A., Tsap, V., & Pappel, I. (2021). Increasing citizen participation in e-participatory budgeting processes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 125-147.

Meijer, A., Curtin, D., Hillebrandt, M., & John, P. (2019). Next-generation participatory governance: A four-dimensional perspective. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 365-375.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1(1), 40.

Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct public engagement in local government. The American review of public administration, 44(4_suppl), 63S-88S.

Nabatchi, T., Gastil, J., Weiksner, G. M., & Leighninger, M. (2012). The second generation of democratic innovations: A national study of 10 democratic innovations. National Civic Review, 101(3), 3-10.

Nabatchi, T., Gastil, J., Weiksner, G. M., Leighninger, M., & O'Leary, R. (2012). Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. Oxford University Press.

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639-653.

Seyfried, G., Fischbach, K., & Fruendt, M. (2018). Information and communication technology (ICT) for citizen engagement in local governments: Insights from Germany. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 596-606.

Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Allegretti, G. (2018). Learning from the South: Participatory budgeting worldwide: An invitation to global cooperation. Transforming cities with collaborative governance, 57-78.

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795-825.

Wamsler, C., Alkan-Olsson, J., Björn, H., Falck, H., Hanson, H., Oskarsson, T., Simonsson, E., & Zelmerlow, F. (2020). Beyond participation: when citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Climatic Change, 158, 235-254.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Adejumo, A., & Abdulkareem, Z. J. (2023). An Analysis of Citizen Engagement and Participation in Local Government Processes. ILORIN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 7(1), 43–55. Retrieved from https://ijad.com.ng/index.php/ijad/article/view/32

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.